Lovejoy 12:40 Thu Jul 30
Tomkins v Stones
|
|
Everton have rejected a 26M bid from Chelsea for Stones.
With this in mind how much do you think Tomkins is worth?
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
sidneyshitcunt
8:40 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
"if you want to buy James Tomkins from us you have to pay more then you would of had to of paid Hull for James Chester"
would OF? Know I *now* that doesn't make sense!
|
Sir Alf
8:33 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
Tomkins has to improve his game on the floor and with the ball at his feet. He has the chance to do that now. He has developed the strength in the air and on the ground from a defensive standpoint but to be international standard its what he can do with the ball (or not) where he is inferior Stones currently IMHO.
|
mallard
7:59 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
12m minimum
|
hub hub hub hub
4:24 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
I dont think we can compare tomkins to the likes of stones on the money basis. Mainly because stones has massive potential. He could be and probably will be Englands next centre back. If your going to compare money between players and try to find out how much tomkins would be worth you'd ha e to compare tomkins with james chester who apparently is moving for £8 million.
If your going to compare them then I'd put tomkins in the 10-13 mill bracket. Thats what he would be worth to us but not many teams would pay that. Bewildering at the prices being thrown about on bang average players really.
|
⚒
4:03 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
Yes, and I'm certain if you said Tomkins was worth £10-15 million at Boozers around the 19 other premiership clubs, they'd all welcome you with open arms, all baffled over the fact a bit part players for several years at a mid table side, has found it hard to attract top clubs and England call ups....
|
whufcroe
3:55 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
I'd love to see one of these spouting off in the boozer later Tomkins is worthless than £5m
Be laughed out the gaff and with that, I'm off down the Stanley
|
Rossal
3:53 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
⚒ 3:38 Thu Jul 30
He is worth that as James Chester went for £8 million yesterday
James Tomkins is better then James Chester
Therefore if you want to buy James Tomkins from us you have to pay more then you would of had to of paid relegated Hull for James Chester
|
Glenn Rodent
3:44 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
I'd agree, but I think if Tomkins had 3 seasons playing alongside Terry it would push him on even further.
|
⚒
3:38 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
So, to summarise this. Despite nobody in football going in for Tomkins around 10-15 million ever, no England managers picking him even as backup in a 30 man squad for years, and the fact he's not even guaranteed a place at West Ham who finished 12th and lower in the last two seasons, he is actually worth it that fee, because of a list of on the spot variables created by the fans of his club on here.
|
Hani
3:31 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
haha clueless
|
whufcroe
3:29 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
Tomkins or Smalling on the other hand.............
|
whufcroe
3:28 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
Cahill
|
Glenn Rodent
3:28 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
Genuine question for people; who do you think is better -
Tomkins OR Cahill?
|
whufcroe
3:28 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
Someone is actually using overseas player prices as a guide.....
Brilliant
Still he's also using the old England chestnut as well as if Woy not picking him is some sort of factor.
I find it baffling, I really do that West Ham fans don't rate Tomkins even on par with Chester.
|
Rossal
3:24 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
He is English so you add £5 million simple as
You are forgetting both the players mentioned below the club were happy to let leave. We do not want Tomkins to leave so again the price rises
|
⚒
3:21 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
Sorry, that was to Rossal. Probably a fairer comparison than Downing due to his age and position.
|
⚒
3:19 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
We've just bought a guy from Champions League finalist, with title honours, international caps, around the same age for what could be £10 million right?
Alderweireld, 40+ caps for Belgium, Titles in Holland, Titles in spain, champions league runners up, superb for Southampton who finished right up there, goes to Tottenham for £11million.
Going by the European market valuation here, how many sides in Europe does anyone think is going to in for a bid £10-15 million for Tomkins based on that?
|
Rossal
3:17 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
⚒ 3:02 Thu Jul 30
So Tomkins entering his prime is worth less than a guy who is 31 and coming to the end
baffling
|
Hani
3:14 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
Lewis Dunk is good player any Brighton fan will tell you that. He's tall but quick, it's just his attitude like Tomkins that lets him down.
|
⚒
3:13 Thu Jul 30
Re: Tomkins v Stones
|
Well you are just reinforcing the point there. Brighton valued him at £5million. The rest of the premiership didn't.
A bit like slapping 10-15million on Tomkins. Nobody will buy him for that. Nobody has. He's not even got a call for an England call up.
|
| 
